Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Eight Reasons Gas Will Hit $5 This Year


The price of gas is a widely covered news item these days. Oil prices have moved up from $75 a barrel in October of last year to more than $100 a barrel currently. And the trend continues to point toward even higher oil prices. Of course, along with the price of oil, gas prices have also risen, almost in lockstep.
The price of gasoline today is 10% higher than it was just two months ago. The average price for a gallon of regular is almost $3.62. Gas prices in January have been the highest ever recorded price for that month. Many economists and energy analysts believe a rise to $4 a gallon is inevitable. But their estimates could be grossly understated. Gas will reach $5 a gallon before the end of the year.
Two warring trends are pushing and pulling gas prices. On the one hand, Americans now drive less than at any time in the past 11 years. On the other hand, gasoline and oil inventories are at very low levels around the world, and traders believe that supply will tighten significantly. The fact that Americans drive much less will not offset an interruption of supply from the Middle East, a decision by refineries to charge more to turn oil into gasoline, or higher demand from emerging economies like China and India.
24/7 Wall St. reviewed the major reasons that gas prices have risen in the past quarter and analyzed whether the causes will improve or worsen. We have estimated how much each factor could increase gas prices. Together, those increases would be enough to push gas prices up by another $1.50.
1. Strait of Hormuz
About 20% of the crude oil produced in the world is shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, and Iran has threatened to shut down shipping traffic through the Strait. At its narrowest, the passage is 30 miles wide, so there is a realistic case that a conflict could close it. Iran has already been isolated as a trade partner by U.S. and EU sanctions. The regime in the country has made a number of threats about what it might do if its “national interests” were threatened. If Iran follows through with its threats, the period the passage is closed could be very brief if the U.S. Navy, which has a carrier group in the region, moved to reopen the lane. But it is not clear that the American government would make that decision without the open support of allies or the United Nations. A closure of the passage, or any escalation that would make a closure more likely, will drive oil prices higher — and by extension, gasoline prices.
2Iran
Iran contributes to a second problem in terms of global oil supply well beyond that of its ability to interrupt supply. Because of the embargo against the nation due to nuclear weapons violations, the U.S. has pressured large oil importers such as Japan to act to isolate Iran by cutting their imports. This puts Japan in a position in which it has to tap even tighter global supply. Japan apparently has agreed to cut its Iranian crude imports by 20%. But as the world’s third largest oil importer, Japan indeed will have to get its oil somewhere other than Iran — which will put more pressure on current production.
3. Refiners Likely to Raise Prices
Most of the oil refined on the east coast of the U.S. is Brent crude, a type of oil produced from the North Sea. The price of Brent — more than $124 a barrel — is almost $16 higher than the price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude, the amount most people read about in the media. But because Brent has replaced WTI as the global price benchmark, U.S. refiners set prices for gasoline and other products as if Brent were the only grade of crude used. That allows refiners with access to cheaper WTI to make larger profits.
However, when the prices converge, as happened in the final two months of 2011, WTI refiners lose their edge — and their hefty profits. “Refiners were losing money in November and December. You can only lose money for so long,” John Felmy, chief economist for the American Petroleum Institute, recently said. Many large refineries are owned by public companies that do not have much appetite for posting ongoing losses. To avoid losses, refiners will have to increase gasoline prices.
4. Other Geopolitical Risks
Iran does not present the only geopolitical challenge to oil production. In Nigeria, which is the 14th largest producer of oil in the world, Islamic terrorist group Boko Haram has continued to attack Christian areas of the country. The Nigerian Army has reacted by attacking Islamists. Militants have continued to attack pipelines, apparently in a move to disrupt the government.
Meanwhile, there are concerns about supply even from Venezuela. Venezuela is the world’s 11th largest producer of crude. The regime there has been fairly stable under the 13-year reign of Hugo Chavez. But Chavez is due for a second cancer surgery later this month. The Miami Herald recently wrote that “some analysts question his [Chavez] ability to hold onto the presidency through the current election cycle.”
Other parts of the Middle East and Africa are also in turmoil. Analysts recently mentioned Bahrain, Libya, Iraq, Nigeria and Yemen as political flashpoints. “The world faces oil supply risks from a multitude of sources, not only in the Middle East but also in Africa. In our view, not since the late 1970s/early 1980s has there been such a serious threat to oil supply,” Soozhana Choi, Deutsche Bank’s head of Asia commodities research, said in a note to clients recently. All these flashpoints translate to further concerns about oil supply. And when oil supplies are tight, the price of oil — and gasoline — increases.
5. European Union Recession
For now, Greece has been bailed out again – a move that should buoy confidence in the region and encourage demand for oil. Even with the Greek bailout, however, the eurozone is not out of the woods as nations continue to implement austerity measures to protect against the risk of default on sovereign debt.
While some experts believe the risk of defaults in the region is overblown, several economies in the eurozone continue to be in trouble. According to a recent European Commission forecast, the eurozone GDP will contract 0.3 percent, driven in part by deep recessions in several southen EU nations, including Spain and Portugal.
Either way, deepening financial and economic trouble in Europe would drop demand for oil there. However, if leaders in the region can settle on mechanisms to protect nations with financial problems from default, national budgets will not be cut to extraordinarily low levels — levels that would otherwise kill both consumer demand and business demand for oil.
[More from 24/7WallSt.com: The Six Most Profitable Stores in America]
6. U.S. Economic Recovery
An improved U.S. economy means higher oil prices. U.S. GDP, employment and even housing have all staged unexpected improvements in recent months. Many economists now peg a 2012 GDP increase at more than 2%. The new White House budget assumes growth of 3% by 2013. An average of more than 100,000 jobs has been created in each of the past six months. And an extension of payroll tax cuts through the end of this year may further aid the employment recovery. An extension of unemployment benefits means that hundreds of thousands of American who would have no income, will have at least enough to consume basic goods and services. The argument that Americans now drive less is not a powerful one for gas and oil demand when a healthy economy also means more consumption of oil for business, petrochemicals and jet fuel. Demand for oil-based products across the entire economy will pick up with any recovery.
7. It Is Almost Summer
In the U.S., summer vacation driving has historically boosted demand for gasoline. Over the past three or so years, however, that boost has been small, if present at all. In 2011, U.S. traffic volume decreased year-over-year in every month except January and February. But that was last year. So long as the U.S. economy continues to improve, more drivers will be on the road this summer.
8. Supply Risk
In December 2011, OPEC members produced nearly 31 million barrels a day, cutting the cartel’s spare capacity capability from 3.18 million barrels per day to 2.85 million. Saudi Arabia accounts for 2.15 million of those daily barrels of spare capacity.
Whether this data is accurate is arguable. What is not arguable is that starting to pump the spare capacity will take time, which will not be very helpful in the event that the Strait of Hormuz is closed or some other geopolitical risk is realized.
Then there is Russia, the world’s first or second largest producer, depending on which day you look at the data. The OECD is counting on Russian production to make up for some of the short supplies and to grow by 1.4% to 10.72 million barrels a day in 2012. Russia grew its production by 1.2% in 2011. An additional gain of 17% in 2012 could signify that the OECD is hoping that Russian production can grow even more. There is no guarantee that Russia will deliver.
Supply from Canada, the U.S., Australia and Brazil is expected to rise in 2012, though North Sea production is expected to fall. The OECD estimates global demand in 2012 of 90 million barrels a day and global supply essentially equal to projected supply. Nothing about that state of affairs should lead anyone to a conclusion that prices will fall.

Obama Issues Another Unconstitutional Edict



This story comes from the Yahoo! Contributor Network, where individuals publish their unique perspectives on some of the world’s most popular websites.
Do you have a story to tell? Become a Yahoo! contributor
COMMENTARY | President Barack Obama issued an executive order Tuesday establishing another new bureaucracy.
Obama again circumvented Congress with his latest Executive Order, the Establishment of the Interagency Trade Enforcement Center.
The order begins with the line, "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America," which begs the question: Is the president ignorant or indifferent?
The Constitution gives the president no such power to regulate commerce. This power is exclusive to the Congress.
Obama's presidential aggrandization should come as no shock from a man who ordained himself a professor when, in reality, only reaching the rank of "senior lecturer," as reported by FactCheck.org.
On March 30, 2007, Obama stated, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president [George W. Bush] I actually respect the Constitution." His track record proves differently.
To be fair, he is not the first president to improperly use the executive order, which is as stated, an order to the executive branch, not a law. The argument will no doubt be that Article 2, Section 3 gives the president power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." But the law is that Congress regulates foreign commerce, not the president, therefore to properly execute the law he must defer to Congress.
Even Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black makes this distinction in Youngstown Sheet and Tube v Sawyer (1952), in which he writes, "The President's power to see that the laws are faithfully executed refutes the idea that he is to be a lawmaker."
This falls in line with the president's "We Can't Wait" campaign, which, contrary to appearances, is not as much a dig on Congress as it is a realization he only has until January to institute as much of his destructive policies as he can before he loses his job, as have millions of Americans during his administration.
If Obama is a "constitutional scholar," then he is deliberately violating the Constitution that he swore to uphold while taking his oath of office. Whether it be this or the governmental trespass on religion under his self imposed authority, it is clear he has no respect whatsoever for the Constitution.
Any real constitutional scholars care to weigh in on why I have it right or wrong?

Coyotes keeping experts busy



Coyotes keeping experts busy
Credit: Amy Scarborough
by CAROLINE MCMILLIAN / Charlotte Observer
Posted on February 26, 2012 at 6:09 PM
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- As coyotes roam Charlotte, local pest-control experts' phones are ringing with calls from concerned residents.
Though coyotes migrated from the Midwest to the Carolinas a decade ago, recent months have seen an uptick of concern about their proliferation.
People are spotting them on their greenways, in their neighborhoods and parks. Cats have gone missing and a handful of dogs have been attacked in neighborhoods along McAlpine Greenway and elsewhere.
Chris Flanagan, general manager of the local Critter Control, said that even though he gets several calls about coyotes a month, he's not yet ready to take on coyote trapping.
Trappers most often use a series of leg traps, camouflaged with the surroundings, to catch coyotes. But in setting the trap, you run the risk of a pet or stray accidentally stepping into it.
An incident like that could upset pet owners and animal activists and wouldn't be good for business, Flanagan said.
"Public perception just hasn't changed enough for us to risk the poor publicity we would get," said Flanagan. "It's going to take a very serious situation for people's opinions to change."
Flanagan directs people to the North Carolina Wildlife ResourceCommission website, where a long list of licensed coyote trappers is available.
Though he doesn't hunt coyotes, Flanagan, who lives on farmland in the northernmost part of Iredell County, has had a number of run-ins with them. For years, he said, coyotes had been stealing neighbors' livestock, and feral cats were missing.
Gone was the native turkey population, and it used to be that you could see "200 in a flock at a time."
But then the coyotes disappeared, which Flanagan believes is due to either a disappearing food supply or disease spreading through the packs.
Chris Matthews, natural resources manager for Mecklenburg County Park and Recreation, recently developed a web form where residents can report coyote sightings.
Matthews said more than 600 sightings from across the county have been reported since the page went up earlier this month. But the county has logged only half of the sightings on a map. So far, clusters of 15 to 20 coyotes have been reported west of the University area, along a stretch from Plaza Midwood to Cotswold, in Matthews and in the Arboretum area of south Charlotte.
Surprisingly, no sightings have been reported in Mint Hill where there's lots of open land, said Matthews, but that doesn't mean they aren't there. It could be that Mint Hill residents just haven't logged their sightings.
Licensed trapper Walter English, who's on the state list, traps across Mecklenburg and surrounding counties.
English started trapping in 1976 and quit the business in 1989. He picked up trapping again six years ago when he started hearing about coyote sightings.
That first year, in 2006, he trapped 16 coyotes in South Carolina. The second year, he trapped 35.
English charges $100 to $150 for a setting-up fee, and then an additional charge once he catches the coyote. If he doesn't trap the coyote within 10 days, though, he refunds the initial charge.
A-1 Wildlife Control founder Allen Eckman said he's been getting a call about coyotes about every two weeks - three times the usual amount.
Most are from the outskirts of the city, around I-485, and in the towns of Matthews, Davidson and Rock Hill.
But many people aren't interested in his private services once they find out they'll have to pay for them. Concerns over the proliferating coyote population have prompted N.C. wildlife officials to consider expanding the hours when coyotes can be hunted.
Currently, coyote hunting is permitted in North Carolina only during the day. But the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission is proposing that coyotes - and feral pigs - be hunted at night with guns, except on Sundays, when bow-and-arrow hunting would be the only legal method.
What's unclear, however, is how the proposal would affect residents in Charlotte and other urban areas, where the use of firearms and archery equipment is limited by law.
The N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission has scheduled public hearings on the proposed hunting law changes. Matthews and his agency are searching for money to pay for collars with GPS to tag coyotes and track their movement.
"We are having ... discussions with some of the (county) budget people, and we've had some discussions with the state," said Matthews. "But we don't have anything firmed up right now."